Me being black shields me from the idiocy of the west when it comes to being “just another bigoted, racist, xenophobic white man who has a problem with cultures other than his.” Though, In this society today, I guess I’m not fully protected from those smear tactics, there’s still hope, for the those who doth protest to much, with the word “Islamaphobic” in the medias slanderous game of name calling.
The word Islamophobia has an interesting beginning here in the US.
In October 1, 2010 at Capitol Hill, Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, who was apart of the U.S Branch of the Muslim Brotherhood and the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) -which is funded by the Muslim Brotherhood abroad, described a meeting in the early 1996, Northern Virginia . Where the Dawn of the mainstream use of the word Islamophobia was appearing, five years before the the infamous date of 9-11, I may add.

He says:
“Any critic of the radical Islamic wing is branded as an enemy. You cannot disagree with them … There is no debate with these people.”

He says, they molded it from another term NOW used to silence Critique, Homophobia. So that to be labeled as such would mean you have an irrational fear of Islam. He said the group meeting at IIIT saw “Islamophobia” as a way to “beat up their critics.”

“This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” Abdur-Rahman who is also black said he is offended by the label of Islamophobia. He insists that if America was genuinely Islamophobic, Muslims would have been rounded up after 9/11 and put into camps. “No such thing occurred”. He Instead explains Muslims complained about increased prejudice at airports.

“You had Muslims saying, ‘she looked at me at the airport, they looked funny at me. I was oppressed,’ Muhammad said. “No, this country just got hit by our people – by Muslims. And they’re acting like all of this anxiety over Islams and Muslims is happening in some type of vacuum, like 9/11 didn’t happen, like Fort Hood didn’t happen, like Abdulmutallab trying to put a bomb on a plane didn’t happen – like none of this is happening.”

What’s funny is he considered himself a moderate Muslim and sees the need for reform, similar to the Christians that separated church and state. The problem is this is Islam, the lying and covert tactics he explained that group like CAIR and IIIT to fool the west and silence critics, is foundational  to Islamic doctrine and history.

The Prophet Muhammad surely did say “War Is Deceit” (recorded by Sahih al-Bukhari 3029, 3030 and by Sunan Abi Dawud 2636). One of many reformers like Muhammad Taha in 1985 was executed for such a suggestion. Taha was hung by the neck until dead by the Muslim Sudanese government for suggesting a change in Islam. Quran 5:3 Allah, the Supreme Creator in Islam said “…This day have I perfected your religion for you, and have completed my mercy upon you; and I am well pleased that Islam be your religion…”, so in Islam their is NO need for change other wise that would be “Bidah”, innovation. Which is “Haram” forbidden in Islam.

More here:

“https://www.investigativeproject.org/2217/moderate-muslim-speak-out-on-capitol-hill
Oh wait I forgot, reality and truth isn’t what people who agree with the use of Islamophobia, want to hear or believe. So all of what I showed will be null and void, because no one will care, and continue to spout that all religions have their bad actors and that it doesn’t mean the religion is bad or evil. What a pitiful bubble we’ve blew around ourselves.

Unapologeticapologia.com